IMPACT OF SUSTAINABILITY APPROACHES ON ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE INTERVENING ROLE OF QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02      10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02      Published : Dec 2018
Authored by : Afraseyab Khattak , Sajid Rahman Khattak

02 Pages : 9-17

References

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197-218.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967. competitiveness and economic performance. In Managing the business case for corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? InternJ. Qual. Serv. Sci. 7(2/3), 184-200.
  • Delai, I. & Takahashi, S. (2013). Corporate sustainability in emerging markets: insights from the practices reported by the Brazilian retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 211-221, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.029
  • Hahn, T., Scheermesser, M. (2006).Approaches to Corporate Sustainability among German Companies.Corp. Soc. Responsible. Environ. Manag. 13, 150-165.
  • Hart, S. L., Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manage. Exec. 17(2), 56-69.
  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
  • Jamian, R., Ab Rahman, M. N., Deros, B. M., & Ismail, N. Z. N. (2012). A conceptual model towards sustainable management system based upon 5s practice for manufacturing SMEs. Asia pacific journal of operations management, 1(1), 19-31.
  • Khattak, S. R., Saeed, I., & Tariq, B. (2018). Corporate Sustainability Practices and Organizational Economic Performance. Global Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 343-355.
  • Koo, C., Chung, N., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2014),
  • Koo, D., Piratla, K., & Matthews, C. J. (2015). Towards sustainable water supply: schematic development of big data collection using internet of things (IoT). Procedia engineering, 118, 489-497.
  • Lozano, R., 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 14-26.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., &Gomišček, B. (2017).The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. Journal of cleaner production, 171, 423433.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., &Gomišček, B. (2016). Effect of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organizational performance: An empirical examination. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 1171- 1190
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014b). The Relationship between Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Practices and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Slovenian Organizations. Organ. 47(1), 3-13.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014). Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 79, 15 September, 182-194.
  • Marcus, A.A. and Fremeth, A.R. (2009),
  • Matten, D., Moon, J., (2008). 'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad.Manag. Rev. 33(2), 404-424.
  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.
  • Wagner, M., &Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness? Greener Management International, 5-16.
  • Wagner, M., (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic Performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1553-1560.
  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
  • Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of environmental management, 196, 569-582.
  • Young, W., & Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402-415.
  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26, 76-85.
  • Fairfield, K.D., Harmon, J. & Behson, S.J. (2011). Influences on the organizational implementation of sustainability: an integrative model . Organization Management Journal, 8, 4-20.
  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
  • Wagner, M. and Schaltegger, S. (2004),
  • Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Psomas, E.L., Fotopoulos, C.V. and Kafetzopoulos, D.P. (2011),
  • Prajogo, D., Tang, A.K.Y. and Lai, K. (2012),
  • Wagner, M. (2005),
  • Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2006),
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. and Gomišček, B. (2014a),
  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., and Gomišček, B. (2014b),
  • Kuei, C. and Lu, M.H. (2013),
  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197-218.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967. competitiveness and economic performance. In Managing the business case for corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? InternJ. Qual. Serv. Sci. 7(2/3), 184-200.
  • Delai, I. & Takahashi, S. (2013). Corporate sustainability in emerging markets: insights from the practices reported by the Brazilian retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 211-221, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.029
  • Hahn, T., Scheermesser, M. (2006).Approaches to Corporate Sustainability among German Companies.Corp. Soc. Responsible. Environ. Manag. 13, 150-165.
  • Hart, S. L., Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manage. Exec. 17(2), 56-69.
  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
  • Jamian, R., Ab Rahman, M. N., Deros, B. M., & Ismail, N. Z. N. (2012). A conceptual model towards sustainable management system based upon 5s practice for manufacturing SMEs. Asia pacific journal of operations management, 1(1), 19-31.
  • Khattak, S. R., Saeed, I., & Tariq, B. (2018). Corporate Sustainability Practices and Organizational Economic Performance. Global Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 343-355.
  • Koo, C., Chung, N., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2014),
  • Koo, D., Piratla, K., & Matthews, C. J. (2015). Towards sustainable water supply: schematic development of big data collection using internet of things (IoT). Procedia engineering, 118, 489-497.
  • Lozano, R., 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 14-26.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., &Gomišček, B. (2017).The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. Journal of cleaner production, 171, 423433.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., &Gomišček, B. (2016). Effect of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organizational performance: An empirical examination. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 1171- 1190
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014b). The Relationship between Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Practices and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Slovenian Organizations. Organ. 47(1), 3-13.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014). Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 79, 15 September, 182-194.
  • Marcus, A.A. and Fremeth, A.R. (2009),
  • Matten, D., Moon, J., (2008). 'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad.Manag. Rev. 33(2), 404-424.
  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.
  • Wagner, M., &Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness? Greener Management International, 5-16.
  • Wagner, M., (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic Performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1553-1560.
  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
  • Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of environmental management, 196, 569-582.
  • Young, W., & Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402-415.
  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26, 76-85.
  • Fairfield, K.D., Harmon, J. & Behson, S.J. (2011). Influences on the organizational implementation of sustainability: an integrative model . Organization Management Journal, 8, 4-20.
  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
  • Wagner, M. and Schaltegger, S. (2004),
  • Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Psomas, E.L., Fotopoulos, C.V. and Kafetzopoulos, D.P. (2011),
  • Prajogo, D., Tang, A.K.Y. and Lai, K. (2012),
  • Wagner, M. (2005),
  • Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2006),
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. and Gomišček, B. (2014a),
  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., and Gomišček, B. (2014b),
  • Kuei, C. and Lu, M.H. (2013),

Cite this article

    APA : Khattak, A., & Khattak, S. R. (2018). Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance. Global Management Sciences Review, III(I), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02
    CHICAGO : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III (I): 9-17 doi: 10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02
    HARVARD : KHATTAK, A. & KHATTAK, S. R. 2018. Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance. Global Management Sciences Review, III, 9-17.
    MHRA : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III: 9-17
    MLA : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III.I (2018): 9-17 Print.
    OXFORD : Khattak, Afraseyab and Khattak, Sajid Rahman (2018), "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance", Global Management Sciences Review, III (I), 9-17
    TURABIAN : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review III, no. I (2018): 9-17. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02