Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review
The major points are summed up in this. Looking at the causal effects of these two forms of governance on CSR involvement, the goal of this work is to establish the empirical link between "corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR)". Initially, delayed "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)" seems to have minimal effect on "Corporate Governance (CG)". On the other hand, delaying the CG variable favours corporate involvement in CSR projects. This is still the case when one takes into account other aspects unique to the company. We use a sizable and varied American sample. Agency theory and stakeholder theory are examined in connection to CFP and CSR. The purpose is to prioritise these three concepts. Despite endogeneity bias, CSR actions boost corporate CFP. The facts do not support stakeholder conflict-resolution theory or agency CSR overinvestment hypothesis. CFP growth is also driven by company diversification, worker, community, and environment programmes.
-
Social Responsibility, Endogenous, Corporation, Conflict.
-
(1) Muhammad Shoaib
Lecturer, Department of Public Administration, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Farooq Shah
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Sciences, CECOS University Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Shiraz Khan
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Sciences at CECOS University Peshawar,KP, Pakistan.
-
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
- Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business & Society, 42(1), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302250505
- Campbell, J. Y. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, 104(2), 298–345. https://doi.org/10.1086/262026
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual model of Corporate performance. the Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g
- Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
- Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical Challenges for Business in the new Millennium: corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857692
- Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics &Amp Management Strategy, 16(3), 741–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00156.x
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, evidence, and Implications. the Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: a stakeholder approach.
- Friedman, M. (1970). Comment on Tobin. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883017
- Gatewood, R. D., & Carroll, A. B. (1991). Assessment of Ethical Performance of Organization Members: A Conceptual framework. the Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 667. https://doi.org/10.2307/258976
- Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis.
- Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6
- Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492. https://www.nber.org/chapters/c10491.pdf
- Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrical, 47(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
Cite this article
-
APA : Shoaib, M., Shah, F., & Khan, S. (2024). Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review. Global Management Sciences Review, IX(I), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-I).03
-
CHICAGO : Shoaib, Muhammad, Farooq Shah, and Shiraz Khan. 2024. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review." Global Management Sciences Review, IX (I): 24-28 doi: 10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-I).03
-
HARVARD : SHOAIB, M., SHAH, F. & KHAN, S. 2024. Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review. Global Management Sciences Review, IX, 24-28.
-
MHRA : Shoaib, Muhammad, Farooq Shah, and Shiraz Khan. 2024. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review." Global Management Sciences Review, IX: 24-28
-
MLA : Shoaib, Muhammad, Farooq Shah, and Shiraz Khan. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review." Global Management Sciences Review, IX.I (2024): 24-28 Print.
-
OXFORD : Shoaib, Muhammad, Shah, Farooq, and Khan, Shiraz (2024), "Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review", Global Management Sciences Review, IX (I), 24-28
-
TURABIAN : Shoaib, Muhammad, Farooq Shah, and Shiraz Khan. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Review." Global Management Sciences Review IX, no. I (2024): 24-28. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-I).03