ARTICLE

IMPACT OF SUSTAINABILITY APPROACHES ON ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE INTERVENING ROLE OF QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

02 Pages : 9-17

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02      10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02      Published : Dec 2018

Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance

Abstract

    The idea of corporate sustainability practices has received a lot of attention from management analysts and scholars because it has been shown to have a positive effect on organizational performance. The aim of this study was to find whether QP and IP mediates the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational economic performance. To investigate the specified relationship, Purposive sampling was used to select 227 employees from the banking to participate in this study. Data was collected using a closed-ended questionnaire with a five-point Likert-type scale. Instrument validity was measured through exploratory factor analysis, and instrument reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Regression analysis was used to test the research hypotheses, and for indirect effect mediation analysis was used. according to regression analysis, Sustainability exploration and exploitation have a significant and positive relationship with organizational economic performance. The results of the mediation analysis suggest that the relationship between the sustainability practices and organizational economic performance is mediated by both quality and innovative performance. The study found that the ability to survive in this competitive environment, businesses must change their concentration from short-term benefits to long-term sustainable benefits.

    Sustainability, Practices, Quality Performance, Innovative Performance, Organizational Performance, Banking

    (1) Afraseyab Khattak
    Research Assistant, The University of Agriculture Peshawarm KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Sajid Rahman Khattak
    Assistant Professor, The University of Agriculture Peshawarm KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197-218.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967. competitiveness and economic performance. In Managing the business case for corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? InternJ. Qual. Serv. Sci. 7(2/3), 184-200.
  • Delai, I. & Takahashi, S. (2013). Corporate sustainability in emerging markets: insights from the practices reported by the Brazilian retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 211-221, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.029
  • Hahn, T., Scheermesser, M. (2006).Approaches to Corporate Sustainability among German Companies.Corp. Soc. Responsible. Environ. Manag. 13, 150-165.
  • Hart, S. L., Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manage. Exec. 17(2), 56-69.
  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
  • Jamian, R., Ab Rahman, M. N., Deros, B. M., & Ismail, N. Z. N. (2012). A conceptual model towards sustainable management system based upon 5s practice for manufacturing SMEs. Asia pacific journal of operations management, 1(1), 19-31.
  • Khattak, S. R., Saeed, I., & Tariq, B. (2018). Corporate Sustainability Practices and Organizational Economic Performance. Global Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 343-355.
  • Koo, C., Chung, N., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2014),
  • Koo, D., Piratla, K., & Matthews, C. J. (2015). Towards sustainable water supply: schematic development of big data collection using internet of things (IoT). Procedia engineering, 118, 489-497.
  • Lozano, R., 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 14-26.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., &Gomišček, B. (2017).The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. Journal of cleaner production, 171, 423433.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., &Gomišček, B. (2016). Effect of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organizational performance: An empirical examination. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 1171- 1190
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014b). The Relationship between Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Practices and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Slovenian Organizations. Organ. 47(1), 3-13.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B., (2014). Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 79, 15 September, 182-194.
  • Marcus, A.A. and Fremeth, A.R. (2009),
  • Matten, D., Moon, J., (2008). 'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad.Manag. Rev. 33(2), 404-424.
  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.
  • Wagner, M., &Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness? Greener Management International, 5-16.
  • Wagner, M., (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic Performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1553-1560.
  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
  • Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of environmental management, 196, 569-582.
  • Young, W., & Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402-415.
  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26, 76-85.
  • Fairfield, K.D., Harmon, J. & Behson, S.J. (2011). Influences on the organizational implementation of sustainability: an integrative model . Organization Management Journal, 8, 4-20.
  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
  • Wagner, M. and Schaltegger, S. (2004),
  • Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Psomas, E.L., Fotopoulos, C.V. and Kafetzopoulos, D.P. (2011),
  • Prajogo, D., Tang, A.K.Y. and Lai, K. (2012),
  • Wagner, M. (2005),
  • Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2006),
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. and Gomišček, B. (2014a),
  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., and Gomišček, B. (2014b),
  • Kuei, C. and Lu, M.H. (2013),

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Khattak, A., & Khattak, S. R. (2018). Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance. Global Management Sciences Review, III(I), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III (I): 9-17 doi: 10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHATTAK, A. & KHATTAK, S. R. 2018. Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance. Global Management Sciences Review, III, 9-17.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III: 9-17

MLA

    MLA : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review, III.I (2018): 9-17 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khattak, Afraseyab and Khattak, Sajid Rahman (2018), "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance", Global Management Sciences Review, III (I), 9-17

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khattak, Afraseyab, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Sustainability Approaches on Organizational Economic Performance: Intervening Role of Quality and Innovative Performance." Global Management Sciences Review III, no. I (2018): 9-17. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2018(III-I).02