ARTICLE

THE IMPACT OF COACHING LEADERSHIP ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AS MEDIATOR AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AS MODERATOR

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

07 Pages : 77-90

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-III).07      10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-III).07      Published : Sep 2024

The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator

Abstract

    Coaching leadership (CL) is an important corporate strategy for improving employee performance at the workplace. We examine how CL affects "innovative work behavior (IWB)" while taking into account the moderating influence of "perceived organizational support (POS)" and the mediation role of "psychological capital (PsyCap)". We obtained the quantitative data from the health department of Gujranwala District, Punjab, Pakistan. The findings of the study show that CL has a significant impact on IWB. PsyCap mediates the relationship between CL and IWB. The POS moderates the relationship between CL and IWB. The findings suggest that CL acts as a catalyst for enhancing employees' PsyCap by fostering positive psychological states such as optimism, resilience, self-efficacy, and hope.

    Coaching Leadership, Innovative Work Behavior, Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Capital

    (1) Muhammad Zaheer Abbas
    M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Management Sciences, Institute of Management Sciences (IMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Asmat N. Khattak
    Associate Professor & HOD, Department of Management Sciences, Head of ORIC, Institute of Management Sciences (IMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abbas, M., Raja, U., Darr, W., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2012). Combined effects of perceived politics and psychological capital on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1813–1830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455243 

  • Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2019). Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(6), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1580772 
  • Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. (2015). The impacts of person-organisation fit and perceived organisational support on innovative work behaviour: the mediating effects of knowledge sharing behaviour. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 7(4), 263. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijiscm.2015.075632 
  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Saeed, B. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-05-2014-0152 
  • Akhtar, F., Khan, H., & Suleman, A. (2018). The impact of psychological capital, supervisor support, and risk tolerance in managers on innovative work behavior. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(3), 632–641.
  • Amabile, T. (2021). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20294 
  • Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., & Pigeon, N. G. (2010). Two field studies examining the association between positive psychological capital and employee performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(5), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011056425 
  • Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L., & West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(2), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130020401 
  • Bandura, A. (2012). Cultivate Self‐efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness., 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch10 
  • Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87 
  • Basu, R., & Green, S. (2020). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477–499.
  • Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Bouckenooghe, D., Zafar, A., & Raja, U. (2014). How ethical leadership shapes employees’ job performance: the mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2162-3 
  • Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001 
  • Coutu, D. (2022). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 46–55.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
  • De Castro, T., Seraspi, J., Mortel, M., Vigonte, F., & Abante, M. V. (2023). Organizational justice and POS as predictors of work engagement of local government unit employees in Naujan, Oriental Mindoro. Oriental Mindoro.
  • De Jong, J. P., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546 
  • De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., & Van Hootegem, G. (2015). Job design, work engagement and innovative work behavior:: A multi-level study on Karasek’s learning hypothesis. Management Revu, 26(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1688/mrev-2015-02-despiegelaere 
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., De Jonge, J., Janssen, P. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 27(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.615 
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51 
  • Fredrickson, B. (2024). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377.
  • Goff, P., Guthrie, J. E., Goldring, E., & Bickman, L. (2014). Changing principals’ leadership through feedback and coaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 682–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-10-2013-0113 
  • Gohoungodji, P., & Amara, N. (2022). Art of innovating in the arts: definitions, determinants, and mode of innovation in creative industries, a systematic review. Review of Managerial Science, 17(8), 2685–2725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00597-7 
  • Gong, Y., Huang, J., & Farh, J. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee Creativity: the mediating role of employee Creative Self-Efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670890 
  • Gray, D. E. (2006). Executive coaching: towards a dynamic alliance of psychotherapy and transformative learning processes. Management Learning, 37(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606070221 
  • Gupta, V., & Singh, S. (2014). Psychological capital as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and creative performance behaviors: empirical evidence from the Indian R&D sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(10), 1373–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.870311 
  • Huang, K., Wu, J., Lu, S., & Lin, Y. (2015). Innovation and technology creation effects on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2187–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.028 
  • Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. (2007). A Review of Employee Well‐Being and Innovativeness: an opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x 
  • Jabeen, R., & Munir, S. (2018). The mediating role of psychological capital in the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management and Research, 5(2), 1–20.
  • Kim, S., Egan, T. M., Kim, W., & Kim, J. (2013). The impact of managerial coaching behavior on employee Work-Related Reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9286-9 
  • Knezovic, E., & Musrati, M. (2018). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment, and employees' creativity: A gender perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(2).
  • Ladegard, G., & Gjerde, S. (2014). Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.02.002 
  • Lee, G., & Lim, S. (2021). The impact of coaching leadership on innovative behavior of HR managers: The mediating effect of positive psychological capital and organizational commitment. Korean Corporation Management Review, 26(6), 51–71.
  • Lee, K. Y., Ismail, M., Bakit, P., Zakaria, N., Zakaria, N., Jinah, N., Kamil, D., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2022). Building health care leadership capacity in a developing country via Talent Grooming Programme (TGP): experience sharing from the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Leadership in Health Services, 36(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-06-2022-0071 
  • Lopez, Y. P., Dohrn, S., & Posig, M. (2019). The effect of abusive leadership by coaches on Division I student-athletes’ performance: The moderating role of core self-evaluations. Sport Management Review, 23(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.07.001 
  • Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2002). Hope: a new positive strength for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302013003 
  • Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001 
  • Martens, R., & Vealey, R. S. (2023). Successful coaching. Human Kinetics.
  • Masten, A. S., & Reed, M.-G. J. (2002). Resilience in development. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–88). Oxford University Press.
  • Prysmakova, P., & Lallatin, N. (2021). Perceived organizational support in public and nonprofit organizations: Systematic review and directions for future research. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211033822 
  • Raddatz, P. A. (2024). Event-driven changes in person-organization fit: A conceptual integration and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101040 
  • Rousseau, D. (2021). The ‘problem’ of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 665–671.
  • Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait Relevance, trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292 
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY: ITS POTENTIAL ANTECEDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO CREATIVE PERFORMANCE. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429 
  • Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00096-9 
  • Yildiz, E. (2017). The effect of the psychological capital and personality characteristics of employees on their organizational commitment and contribution to the work: A Qualitative Research on Managers. Journal of Management and Strategy, 8(4), 34. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v8n4p34 
  • Yildiz, H. (2019). The interactive effect of positive psychological capital and organizational trust on organizational citizenship behavior. SAGE Open, 9(3), 215824401986266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019862661 
  • Yuan, C. (2017). The effect of coaching leadership and subordinate psychological capital on the employee voice behavior. Science Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20170502.13 
  • Zagenczyk, T. J., Scott, K. D., Gibney, R., Murrell, A. J., & Thatcher, J. B. (2009). Social influence and perceived organizational support: A social networks analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.004 

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Abbas, M. Z., & Khattak, A. N. (2024). The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator. Global Management Sciences Review, IX(III), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-III).07

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer, and Asmat N. Khattak. 2024. "The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator." Global Management Sciences Review, IX (III): 77-90 doi: 10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-III).07

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ABBAS, M. Z. & KHATTAK, A. N. 2024. The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator. Global Management Sciences Review, IX, 77-90.

MHRA

    MHRA : Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer, and Asmat N. Khattak. 2024. "The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator." Global Management Sciences Review, IX: 77-90

MLA

    MLA : Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer, and Asmat N. Khattak. "The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator." Global Management Sciences Review, IX.III (2024): 77-90 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer and Khattak, Asmat N. (2024), "The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator", Global Management Sciences Review, IX (III), 77-90

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer, and Asmat N. Khattak. "The Impact of Coaching Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior, Psychological Capital as Mediator, and Perceived Organizational Support as Moderator." Global Management Sciences Review IX, no. III (2024): 77-90. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2024(IX-III).07